I have to admit the truth to you. The painting you see in the photograph of my set up is not the finished painting you see above. In fact, it is not even the second painting of the Soldier watertower I did. It is the third.
Now, I was “trained up” as a commercial artist so when I start a painting I feel like I can fix just about anything that goes wrong. I have probably worked on a lot of lost causes that I should have given up on. Any sane artist would have cut their losses on half of the ones I just couldn’t let go. So when I admit I did three paintings to get one finished, it is rare. I am thinking that maybe this is a positive step for me.
The first painting on location, in some ways had good things going for it. Done in the hurry that plein air requires, it had its perspective flaws though, but that was not the reason for the do over. I did something that I really never (or hardly ever anyway) do. I painted the subject first instead of the sky. I wanted to capture the subject because of its obvious complexity and I wanted to capture it in the moment. Once back at my temporary studio, I dutifully masked all those guy wires and completed the watertower. Then I masked everything and expected to whoosh in the sky. But right in the middle of the paper, appearing like a secret message under lemon juice, was a big splotch. It was some sort of previously undetectable flaw in the paper. There was no fixing that.
So round two. Having learned quite a bit about my subject from round one and the photo reference I had before me on the laptop, the drawing and masking went a lot faster. I did the sky first, needless to say. Then on to the subject, starting with the roof. I somehow managed to run my sleeve across the wet paint and smear red across the sky. Now, if there is one thing I have learned, it is that there is no coming back in transparent watercolor from recovering a fresh sky after dragging red across it. I cut my losses.
It entered my mind that maybe I wasn’t meant to paint that watertower, but I dismissed the thought because I am stubborn I guess. Round three didn’t happen until I was home. Things didn’t go very smoothly even then, but I did persevere the result was the watercolor above.
I think painting on location brings something to the painting that you don’t get from a photo. For example, the birds flying around and perching on the railing. If I would have just stopped and snapped a photo, I would have missed that. I also referred to my plein air study as much as the photo when I did the studio piece. I also had the practice of painting it before. Don’t miss out on the experience of plein air. Painting outside is a valuable tool, even if you end up repainting it again. And again.